Posted by glassonion on September 8, 2006
I could have sworn that the Dolphins would pull this one out. The game started a bit slow but I really didn’t care as I was finally watching a meaningful NFL game. Some observations:
I really am starting to like Wes Welker. I always had a soft spot for him ever since this wide receiver stepped in for Olindo Mare and kicked a couple of extra points and kicked off during a game a couple years ago. I have a feeling he will be making some huge plays on special teams week in and week out and will even come up with some huge catches this year. He is the Dolphins secret weapon.
Ronnie Brown however is the not so secret weapon. Sure he had a couple of TD’s but nothing really impressed me. He has so much riding on his shoulders this year but I see him as pretty much the second coming of Lamar Smith. He will get his carries, yards and TD’s but it is totally by default. The Dolphins simply don’t have enough depth to even think about giving it to someone else.
It was nice to see Charlie Batch have a good solid game. I was just waiting for him to struggle so that I would have the chance to refer to him as “Charlie Be-atch” but alas his performance spared him of this. I also couldn’t help but notice that either his helmet was way too small for him or he happens to have the largest head ever on a human being. He did throw a couple of great passes and the Heath Miller touchdown pumped me up.
In general, I don’t think that I can recall a team imploding in as short a time period as the ‘Phins did tonight. Jeez, they had the lead and then WHAM, the whole game goes shit-house on them all set in motion by Heath Millers 87 yard reception. By the way, he was TOTALLY out of bounds and Nick Saban should have thrown the red hanky way earlier than he did.
All in all, a pretty good start to the season.
Posted in football, Miami Dolphins, nfl, steelers | 1 Comment »
Posted by glassonion on August 15, 2006
“Google Co-op is a platform which enables you to use your expertise to help other users find information.”
Hmm. Is it me, or does that kind of smell of Web 2.0? Is this Google’s way of letting the people influence the content it presents? It sure does seem like another example of Google trying to follow a trend incognito. Email (Gmail)? No, it wasn’t REALLY email at first but a hard to get BETA product reserved for those in the know. Become a portal? Nope, they are just letting you customize your Google homepage with news, email and add RSS feeds and what not.
“This isn’t Web 2.0, it’s just a way to let John Q. Public ‘help other users find information’ by labeling URLs”
It’s like a Jedi mind trick of sorts. But as always, they come up with great ways to not completely give in to a trend. Now I am not exactly the dumbest guy around (I hope) but reading about how to create a “Topic Definition File” almost made my eyes cross.
In short, they are being really smart about it (as always). This isn’t something that John Q. Public can contribute to (not yet) and I think that’s a really great thing. One of my apprehensions about Web 2.0 was the very fact that the public dictates relevance. Call me cynical, but that reminds me of the days of META KEYWORD’s tag abuse. Maybe it’s all cyclical. I can see it all now. W2.0 maybe waters down relevance because some a-holes out there bring on the dawn of 2.0 spam, hence making for crappier results, ergo bringing back the days of the directory……
Now picture that old dude from the Matrix saying that. This whole post was really a ploy to get to use the word “ergo” by the way. Did I even use it correctly?
I digress and admit: I love a lot of the 2.0 stuff now, but it would suck to see Google become the new AltaVista.
Posted in google, internet, search | 1 Comment »
Posted by glassonion on July 12, 2006
I received two bits of advice about speaking at SES (it was my first one).
1) Always start of with a Mark Twain quote. DONE
2) Make sure to go to the bathroom before your session starts. NOT SO DONE.
Anyhow, great sessions all around the past couple of days. Learned a bunch as well as validated lots of suspicions about the Latino audience. My two big takeaways were the fact that ecommerce is so much harder when dealing with Latin countries given the lack of credit cards as well as the lack of reliable shipping and that there seems to be a general lack of good (or even “spiderable”) spanish content out there.
Posted in internet, search | 1 Comment »
Posted by glassonion on June 30, 2006
So Google launched Google Checkout.
Now I hate to seem cynical about this whole thing, but doesn’t it seem that Google is coming up with more ways to get into your mind? Google Checkout finally launched. Essentially it is their rival to PayPal, It let’s you pay for items with a couple of clicks of the mouse.
Call me paranoid, but isn’t this the ultimate way for one to let Google know exaclty what you are selling therefore giving them insider info to market stats that they could then use to jack up the price of the very ads you pay them for? Don’t ask me about specifics, it’s just my knee jerk reaction.
So I will be speaking at SES Miami, and I am REALLY tempted to start my session with a Google joke. Yes I am an SEM nerd so bear with me. Here it is:
“So Google just launched Google Checkout, is it me ot are they trying to index EVERY aspect of your life? Why just the other morning I was using Google Talk’s audio function and found that by that afternoon Google had indexed my soul.”
OK, not the funniest joke, but in a room full of SEO nerds it might get a laugh or two?
Posted in google, internet, search | Leave a Comment »
Posted by glassonion on June 7, 2006
So the Cowboys went through mini-camp. So far so good methinks. Being a long time Cowboys fan I don't know what to expect this year. I really don't want to make it such a huge deal that this is pretty much our last shoot at doing anything before we go back to six and tensville. Terrell Owens will play his one quiet year and Bill Parcells will make that final push before he rides off into the sunset leaving another team in his wake.
Will it be enough this year? Should I not have vomited with joy when I saw that Peter King picked the Cowboys to win it all? Should I have not named my first born son after Rafael Septien?
These questions and more to be answered in time.
Posted in football, Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »
Posted by glassonion on May 16, 2006
I have to put my foot down here. I don't think the NFL should change their uniform numbering policy. According to KFFL's Hot Of The Wire, the NFL has changed the policy. Of course this will become known as the "Reggie Bush Rule" should it come to pass that he gets to keep using #5.
Call me old fashion, but there is just something really wrong with this. I mean I still haven't gotten used to seeing so many wide receivers with numbers in the teens and not in the 80's. Seriously, one of the reason's I can't stand to watch college football is because there are defensive ends wearing #9, linebackers wearing #34 and running backs wearing #5. It just doesn't feel right to me. I mean come on, how gross did it look to see Heath Shuler back in the 90's playing QB wearing #21? (By the way, is it now going to be the honorable Heath Shuler soon?
This one's a stretch, but it might actually have negative effect on refs calling the game. The whole reason the numbering system came into play was so that refs would be able to tell what position each player is a bit easier. What if there is a game on the line and Reggie Bush get tackled extra hard? Are the refs going to call roughing the passer? Alright, maybe I am just being a big fat baby, but it COULD happen.
Posted in football | Leave a Comment »
Posted by glassonion on May 6, 2006
So MS has decided to boast about its search engine. I admit, it’s pretty impressive what they have done in a relatively short amount of time, but let’s not start bragging too much. I still think their algorithmic search doesn’t turn out hugh quality results (in some cases COMPLETELY irrelevant results) and I gave their new PPC product a wack this past week and was flabbergasted at how incredibly buggy it is. At some points it just wouldn’t work and the interface leaves plenty to be desired.
So chill out there Steve Balmer, launching products that a lot of people may or may not be somewhat forced into using isn’t really progress. it’s propaganda.
Posted in internet, search | Leave a Comment »
Posted by glassonion on May 3, 2006
I have decided to sell one of my guitars. I hate to part with it, but I need the cash. Black Fender Toronado. It's a pretty cool little intrument. Two humbuckers so it's not as thin as one would think a Fender would be.
If anyone is interested I am asking $450 and I will throw in a soft case for it as well.
Posted in guitars, music | 4 Comments »
Posted by glassonion on May 3, 2006
So the family and I are thinking of relocating down to Amelia Island to start a family business. It's a bit of a specialized operation that I think the Island could use. I am curious as to any one's experiences with Amelia Island. More importantly, is there any place in the area that has good schools for the little ones?
We were there like two weeks ago and I for one got such a great vibe from the place.
Posted in business | Leave a Comment »
Posted by glassonion on May 1, 2006
So, Google is complaining about Microsoft being unfair for making the default search engine in the search bar in IE 7. Call me cynical, but this to me sounds like one big bully whining about another type of bully for control of their publics “choices”. Ever since Google went public they have slowly but surely been crawling into the subconcious of the internet public. Not as overtly as MS mind you, but in sort of a Jedi mind trick sort of way. For me this started when Google asked me to log into my Gmail by using my “Google Account”. I thought when I signed up for Gmail I was getting just that, an email account. It’s pretty much a sublime version of the MS Passport idea. One login for everything you do online.
The thing about Google is the sneaky way they are going about it. Once you log into Gmail, if you don’t log out Google pretty much tracks everything you do complete with “Personalized Search” history. I don’t remember opting into that one by the way. It’s a borderline deceptive practice I think. As much as they claim that it is for the benefit of the end user, I can’t help but think that it’s just a way to track your every move under the quise of our benefit. Whatever happen to do no evil?
Posted in google, internet, search | 2 Comments »